![the vatican tapes dvd the vatican tapes dvd](https://moviesofthesoul.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/thevaticantapes-1.jpg)
Pignatone may have special motives for being leery of Diddi’s claims, and not just due to anything that’s happened in a Vatican courtroom.
#THE VATICAN TAPES DVD SERIES#
I repeat, watching the video it’s obvious that the impact that the words of the Promoter of Justice on Perlasca were devastating, and it explains why, on August 31, Perlasca appeared without a lawyer and made a series of declarations that were different and contrary to what he’d said in April.”ĭiddi, for his part, denied there actually was any conversation between the Promoter of Justice and Pope Francis, claiming that his comments to Perlasca were based on an interview the pope had given to a journalist in November 2019. It’s unheard of – such a thing has never happened. The scenario is this: The Promoter of Justice goes to the pope to talk about things relevant to the charges, even if the pope can’t be called and there’s no transcript. “If you watch the video, it’s clear that Perlasca’s face changes expression and he appears upset, devastated. The problem is that the reference to a meeting with the pope had been conveniently omitted from the written summary of the interrogation provided back in August, and it raised questions about whether Perlasca’s testimony had been influenced by threats of negative disclosures from the pope.ĭefense lawyer Luigi Panella, representing one of the Italian businessmen in the case, put things this way.
![the vatican tapes dvd the vatican tapes dvd](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/D0sAAOSwAHlgc2h0/s-l400.jpg)
![the vatican tapes dvd the vatican tapes dvd](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjIxMDU4NTY0OF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMTc5MzUzNjE@._V1_.jpg)
“I can doubt anything, but not the Holy Father.” “Before doing what we’re doing, we went to the Holy Father and we asked him what happened,” he said.
#THE VATICAN TAPES DVD TRIAL#
That set the stage for Wednesday’s hearing, where Pignatone once again insisted that all material be turned over to the court, including the missing bits from the tapes – which could amount to as much as two hours of material.ĭuring the same hearing defense attorneys demanded what amounts to a mistrial, insisting there’s no provision for editing evidence in the rules of procedure for a Vatican trial and that, by now, their right to mount an adequate defense has been fatally compromised.Īdding to the unanswered questions, the portions of the recordings that weren’t obscured included an interrogation of Perlasca in which one of the prosecutors, Italian lawyer Alessandro Diddi, makes on off-hand reference to a conversation between officials of the Promoter of Justice and Pope Francis. This time prosecutors complied, but the 52-DVD set of recordings they submitted contained 38 separate “omissions,” meaning places where material had been cut or obscured, justified only by the vague formula “investigative exigencies.” That was shot down by Pignatone in early October, who once again demanded that the tapes be submitted to the court and made available to the defense.
![the vatican tapes dvd the vatican tapes dvd](https://www.store4you.it/shop/26721-thickbox_default/the-vatican-tapes.jpg)
The prosecutors flatly refused, citing privacy concerns. Pignatone agreed and ordered prosecutors to turn them over by early August. Naturally, defense lawyers wanted access to the recordings, arguing that they had a right to compare them against the transcripts and to see if they provided context or nuance difficult to express in print. When it fell apart, he got ahead of the curve and volunteered to testify against his former colleagues. Perlasca had been the head of the financial affairs office within the Secretariat of State, and, in effect, was one of the architects of the London deal. Among the video recordings were the prosecutors’ exchanges with Italian Monsignor Alberto Perlasca, the start witness in the case.